An open letter to Shobhaa De.

Dear Sobha De, I see you know very well that we live in the largest democracy of the world and we are allowed to enjoy the freedom of expression to its funniest extent.I am not a BJP Supporter and I do not belong to a defined group of feminists but I simply don't agree with the facts ,sentences and the misleading and unresponsible piece of your work published in THE WEEK. LeT'S COME TO THE POINT! JASHODABEN.....I accept I did't know her a week ago and I still choose to know her as a stranger NOT in a sad position as you have introduced her in your column.I am very surprised to see the use of your words for a lady who has't uttered a single word about her personal or professional life. DITCHED by her husband?? Is it the right word to explain a story of a lady who chose to struggle and succeded.Do you have any idea what it takes to start a fresh after such incident.I guess this is the reward for the struggle and the determination of a woman by a woman .You seem very concerned about her futur? why? JashodaBen did't need any help or concern and does't need a prime ministerial Bungalow.It is you and people like you who are shouting and trying to name her Mrs. Modi.Officialy she has no intentions to be known as mrs. Modi and she has no interest in enjoying the perks which comes after being a wife of a famous political leader. you are calling her a lady of zero identity?what do you think of yourself?I think you have misunderstood the words fame and popularity with identity.She is not famous like you but she exists in this world with a lot more dignity and identity in comparison to the women who are forced to live with their husbands with a bundle of compromises and restrictions and rejections and ignorance on the name of marriage.I am not saying what Mr. Narendra Modi did was right but it would have been worst if he would have kept her wife by his side restricting her right to live on her terms.You have said that she was forced to live with his brother and was dependent on her brother. This statement of yours makes me remember: " hamare yahan to ladki ki doli maayke se uthti hai aur sasural se to bas uski arthi" shadi ke baad to aurat ka sasuraal hi uska ghar hota hai......many more....! so you are basically establishing the fact that without a husband ,women has no identity but if she choose to live with her husband or husband forceS her to live with him without any intentions of fullfilling the marital vows, then the identity zone of a wife is safe and I deny it. COMING BACK TO YOU...(How did you suvive?.......heaven knows.........glorify) SHE SURVIVED AND SHE WON! and nobody knows how she managed. This is the glory of a woman.I request to writers like you to choose your words carefully because India is not a country of fools.She has not sacrificed her life ,she has lived her life. For herself and for the children she taught,for her brother who practically fulfilled his duty towards her sister.Don't label her as a BECHARI because she is not.you are calling her life a loveless life.c'mon! there are much more dimensions to love.A married life and living in a house with husband or boyfriend or a partner does't guarantee a lovefull life. She is a MISLEADING women or are you?.She is not trying to lead anybody.She is not trying to prove anything,she is not trying to get anything,she is not trying to keep quiet.She has chosen to keep quiet because she is very strong not because she is weak.It is her right to express herself by her silence.Try to understand what her silence says! I would like to answer you on her behalf: I need not to expose Mr. Modi.This is not a scam.This is my life and I have chosen it this way.yes! What happened was not what I liked and expected but I don't like holding grudges and complaining.I believe in action.I believe in forgiving.I believe in moving on.I am the woman who accepted a husband's rejection and followed a friend's advice. Yes! A man can walk away from his innocent wife without a backward glance,forgetting his duties but credit goes to God's justice and to the constitution of the world's largest democracy ,he will have to acknowledge the identity of a woman at some point of time as Mr. Modi had to. I never used his name or position to get anything.Please don't use it now to snatch my peace. my words...! dear miss De!woman is not a topic to write.you can't impose your opinions just because you are famous.one can interpret relations but you can't define relationships. It is the hightime for the society to accept that woman don't need a husband to safeguard their identity. It is the hightime for women to understand that there is much more to life than being somebody's wife. I apologize if I hurt somebody by this.! Nidhi bharati,8.25a.m.Varanasi

Comments

  1. (Impartial? haa) (Yes) Here is the point, This letter is addressed to Ms. De, hope she will send her reply to the writer's mail box. My simple submission is, it is not Ms. De but Mr. Modi who broke the system of silence as perceived by blogger. In any one who is responsible for this fiasco is the supreme court of India and the title of the blog write-up should be "In Defense of Mr. Modi". It is the Supreme court of land which made this mandatory to fill all the columns in the election nomination application form including marital status. This is double edge sword, like whether to rise for the right of a woman who lived in destitution or be indifferent as if it is a private matter of a very powerful personality and pretend that someone is not afraid of uttering a word against Mr. Modi. This is rather very complicated. It has another dimension too, I have a friend who have known many students who are alleged illigal sons and duaghters of eminent politicians of Jharkhand. Presumably, one can infer that this is an accepted political culture in India to have reign of women beyond the social and legal precincts of Indian practices to demonstrate political power and although unintentionally the blogger is indulging herself in buying that political prescription. The final aspect of this discourse is, in my opinion people should not extrapolate some inferences in the instance of Mrs. Modi without knowing her perspective but the lives of public personalities being in public domain is new and welcome development. Because their life leave an imprint on their decisions and we are direct receivers of outcomes of their decisions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India doesn't need your interpretation of Hinduism!

Preface